• Home
  • People
  • Research
  • Breaking News
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Results
  • Photos
  • Links
  • Downloads
  • Gabor-Jet Model Web App
  • For MRI Subjects
    SELECTED PUBLICATIONS

    2019

  • Hacker, C. M., Zhu, T., Nelken, M., Meschke, E. X., & Biederman, I. (2019). Why is it so difficult to recognize faces differing only moderately in orientation? PsyArxiv. July 10. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/48k5q (Submitted).

  • Hacker, C. M., & Biederman, I. (2019). Why Stretching an Image of a Face Has No Effect on its Recognition. PsyArxiv. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/e5hgx. (Submitted)

  • Margalit, E., Herald, S. B., Meschke, E. M., Irawan, I., Maarek, R., & Biederman, I. (2019). Visual Noise Consisting of X-Junctions Has Only a Minimal Adverse Effect on Object Recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. (In press). Preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/cje3y DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/cje3y

  • Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2019). Pigeons spontaneously form three-dimensional shape categories. Behavioural Processes, 158, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.11.00


    • 2018

  • Hacker, C. M., Meschke, E. X., & Biederman, I. (2018). A face in a (temporal) crowd. Vision Research. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2018.02.007. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Shilowich, B. E., Herald, S. B., Margalit, E., Maarek, R., Meschke, E. X., & Hacker, C. M. (2018). The cognitive neuroscience of person identification. Neuropsychologia. 116, 205-214. [PDF]


    • 2017

  • Margalit, E., Biederman, I., Tjan, B.S., & Shah, M.P. (2017). What is Actually Affected by the Scrambling of Objects When Localizing the Lateral Occipital Complex? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 29(9), 1595-1604. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01144 [PDF] [PDF Plus]


    • 2016

  • Margalit, E., Biederman, I., Herald, S. B., Yue, X., & von der Malsburg, C. (2016). An applet for the Gabor scaling of the differences between complex stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 78(8), 2298-2306. doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1191-7. [PDF]

  • Amir, A., & Biederman, I. (2016). The Neural Correlates of Humor Creativity Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 597. [PDF]

  • Margalit, E., Shah, M. P., Tjan, B. S., Biederman, I., Keller, B., & Brenner, R. (2016). The Lateral Occipital Complex shows no net response to object familiarity. Journal of Vision, 16(11):3, 1-8. [PDF]

  • Vessel, E. A., Biederman, I., Subramaniam, S., & Greene, M. R. (2016). Effective signaling of surface boundaries by L-vertices reflect the consistency of their contrast in natural images. Journal of Vision, 16(9):15, 1-10. doi: 10.1167/16.9.15. [PDF]

  • Shilowich, B. E., & Biederman, I. (2016). An estimate of the prevalence of developmental phonagnosia. Brain & Language, 159, 84-91. [PDF]


    • 2015

  • Xu, X., Biederman, I., Shilowich, B.E., Herald, S.B., Amir, O., & Allen, N.E. (2015). Developmental phonagnosia: Neural correlates and a behavioral marker. Brain & Language, 149, 106-117. Link

  • Peissig, J., Nagasakam, Y., Young, M., Wasserman, E., & Biederman, I. (2015). Using the reassignment procedure to test object representation in pigeons and people. Learning & Behavior, 43, 188-207. Link


    • 2014

  • Xu, X., Biederman, I., & Shah, M. S. (2014). A neurocomputational account of the face configural effect. Journal of Vision, 14, 1-9. Link

  • Herald, S. B., Xu, X., Biederman, I., Amir, O., & Shilowich, B. E. (2014). Phonagnosia: A voice homologue to prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 22:8, 1031-1033. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2014.960670.

  • Amir, O., Biederman, I., Herald, S.B., Shah, M.P., & Mintz, T.H. (2014), Greater Sensitivity to Nonaccidental than Metric Shape Properties in Preschool Children. Vision Research, 97, 83-88. [PDF]

  • Xu, X., & Biederman, I. (2014). Neural correlates of face detection. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 1555-1564. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht005. Link

  • Dickinson, S. & Biederman, I. (2014). Geons. In Ikeuchi, K. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Computer Vision. Pp. 338-346. Springer.


    • 2013

  • Amir, O., Biederman, I., Wang, Z., & Xu, X. (2013). Ha Ha! Versus Aha! A Direct Comparison of Humor to Nonhumorous Insight for Determining the Neural Correlates of Mirth. Cerebral Cortex, 62, 35-43. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht343. Link

  • Biederman, I. (2013). Human object recognition: appearance vs. shape. Ch. 26, Pp. 387-397. In S. J. Dickenson, & Z. Pizlo (Eds.) Shape Perception in Human and Computer Vision. London: Springer. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (2013). Psychophysical and neural correlates of the phenomenology of shape. Ch. 17, Pp. 417-436. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.) Handbook of Experimental Phenomenology: Visual Perception of Shape, Space, and Appearance. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (2013). Remembering Edward E. Smith. Association for Psychological Science Observer, 26, 4.


    • 2012

  • Kim, J. G., & Biederman, I. (2012). Greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than metric changes in the relations between simple shapes in the lateral occipital cortex. NeuroImage. 63, 1818-1826. Link

  • Amir, O., Biederman, I., & Hayworth, K.J. (2012). Sensitivity to nonaccidental properties across various shape dimensions. Vision Research. 62 ,35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.020 Link

  • Lescroart, M. D., & Biederman, I. (2012). Cortical Representation of Medial Axis Structure. Cerebral Cortex. 23, 629-637. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs046 Link

  • Yue, X., Biederman, I., Mangini, M. C., von der Malsburg, C., & Amir, O. (2012). Predicting the Psychophysical Similarity of Faces and Non-Face Complex Shapes by Image-Based Measures. Vision Research. 55,41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.12.012 Link

  • Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2012). Recognition-by-components: A bird's eye view. In Lazareva, O.F., Shimizu, T., Wasserman, E.A. (Eds). How animals see the world: Comparative behavior and biology of vision. Ch. 11, 191-216. Oxford University Press.


    • 2011

  • Amir, O., Biederman, I., & Hayworth, K.J. (2011). The neural basis for shape preferences. Vision Research, 51, 2198-2206. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.015 [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (2011). Herschel W. Leibowitz. (Obituary). Psychological Science, 24, 21.

  • Hayworth, K.J., Lescroart, M.D., & Biederman, I. (2011). Neural encoding of relative position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 37(4), 1032-1050. doi: 10.1037/a0022338 [PDF]

  • Kim, J.G., Biederman I., & Juan, C.H. (2011). The benefit of object interactions arises in the lateral occipital cortex independent of attentional modulation from the intraparietal sulcus: A TMS study. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8320-8324. [PDF]

  • Kim, J.G. & Biederman, I. (2011). Where do objects become scenes? Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1738-1746. Advance Access publication December 8, 2010. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq240 [PDF]


    • 2010

  • Xu, X., & Biederman, I. (2010). Loci of the release from fMRI adaptation for changes in facial expression, identity and viewpoint. Journal of Vision, 10(14):36, 1-13. doi:10.1167/10.14.36. [PDF]

  • Lescroart, M.D., Biederman, I., Yue, X. and Davidoff, J. (2010). A cross-cultural study of the representation of shape: Sensitivity to generalized cone dimensions, Visual Cognition, 18, 50-66. First published (iFirst): 2008. doi: 10.1080/13506280802507806 [Link] [PDF]


    • 2009

  • Xu, X., Yue, X., Lescroart, M.D., Biederman, I., & Kim, J.G. (2009). Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): Image or Person? Vision Research, 49, 2800-2807. [PDF]

  • Kim, J.G., Biederman, I., Lescroart, M.D., & Hayworth, K.J. (2009). Adaptation to objects in the lateral occipital complex (LOC): Shape or semantics? Vision Research, 49, 2297-2305. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Yue, X., Davidoff, J. (2009). Representation of shape in individuals from a culture with minimal exposure to regular simple artifacts: Sensitivity to nonaccidental vs. metric properties. Psychological Science, 20, 1437-1442 [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (2009). Translational and reflectional priming invariance: A retrospective. Perception, 38, 809-825. doi: 10.1068/pmkbie [Invited as one of Perception's 10 most highly cited papers.] [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (2009). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 38, A25-A33. [PDF]


    • 2008

  • Lazareva, O.F., Wasserman, E.A., & Biederman, I. (2008). Pigeons and humans are more sensitive to nonaccidental than to metric changes in visual objects. Behavioral Processes, 77, 199-209. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. & Kim, J.G. (2008). 17,000 years of depicting the junction of two smooth shapes. Perception, 37, 161-164. [PDF]

  • Kim, J.G., Goldman, A.J., & Biederman, I. (2008). Blind or deaf? A matter of aesthetics. Perception. 37, 949-950. [PDF]


    • 2007

  • Biederman, I. (2007). Recent psychophysical and neural research in shape recognition. In N. Osaka, I. Rentschler, & I. Biederman (Eds.) Object Recognition, Attention, and Action. Ch. 5, 71-88. [PDF]

  • Nederhouser, M., Yue, X., Mangini, M.C., & Biederman, I. (2007). The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects. Vision Research, 47, 2134-2142. [PDF]

  • Yue, X., Vessel, E.A., & Biederman, I (2007). The neural basis of scene preferences. NeuroReport, 18, 525-529. [PDF]

  • Lazareva, O.F., Wasserman, E.A., & Biederman, I. (2007). Pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience. Perception, 36, 33-48. [PDF]

  • Russell, R., Biederman, I., Nederhouser, M, & Sinha, P. (2007). The utliity of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces. Vision Research, 47, 157-165. [PDF]


    • 2006

  • Hayworth, K., & Biederman, I. (2006). Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition, Vision Research, 46, 4024-4031. [PDF]

  • Yue, X., Tjan, B.S., & Biederman, I. (2006). What makes faces special? Vision Research, 46, 3802-3811. [PDF]

  • Peissig, J.J., Klipatrick, K., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2006). Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior and Processes, 32, 419-430. [PDF]

  • Martin-Malivel, J., Mangini, M. C., Fagot, J., & Biederman, I. (2006). Do humans and baboons use the same information when categorizing human and baboons faces. Psychological Science, 17, 599-607. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Vessel, E. A. (2006). Perceptual Pleasure and the Brain. American Scientist, 94, 249-255. [PDF]

  • Russell, R., Sinha, P., Biederman, I., Nederhouser, M. (2006). Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation. Perception, 35, 749-759. [PDF]


    • 2005

  • Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., and Biederman, I. (2005). The role of edges in object recognition by pigeons, Perception, 34, 1353-1374. [PDF]

  • Kayaert, G., Biederman, I., Op de Beeck, H., & Vogels, R. (2005). Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 212-224. [PDF]

  • Kayaert, G., Biederman, I, & Vogels, R. (2005). Representation of regular and irregular shapes in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Cerbral Cortex, 15, 1308-1321. [PDF]


    • 2004

  • Mangini, M. C., & Biederman, I. (2004). Making the ineffable explicit: Estimating the information employed for face classification. Cognitive Science, 28, 209-226. [PDF]


    • 2003

  • Kayaert, G., Biederman, I., & Vogels, R. (2003). Shape tuning in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3016-3027. [PDF]

  • Michelon, P., & Biederman, I. (2003). Less impairment in face imagery than face perception in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 41, 421-441. [PDF]


    • 2002

  • Bourcart, M., Biederman, I., Cuervo, C., Danion,. J.-M., & Wagemans, J. (2002). Effect of benzodiazepines on structural and conceptual/lexical priming. Psychopharmacology, 165, 43-50. [PDF]

  • Vogels, R., & Biederman, I. (2002). Effects of lilumination intensity and direction on object coding in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 756-766. [PDF]

  • Peissig, J. J., Wasserman, E. A., Young, M. E., & Biederman, I. (2002) Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthoganal rotational axis in pigeons. Vision Research, 42, 2051-2062. [PDF]

  • Lorincz, A., Szirtes, G., Takacs, B., Biederman, I., Vogels, R. (2002). Relating priming and repetition suppression. International Journal of Neural Systems, 12, 187-202. [PDF]


    • 2001

  • Vogels, R., Biederman, I., Bar, M, & Lorincz, A. (2001). Inferior temporal neurons show greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than metric differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 134, 444-453. [PDF]

  • Fiser, J., Subramaniam, S., & Biederman, I. (2001). Size tuning in the absence of spatial frequency tuning in object recognition. Vision Research, 41, 1931-1950. [PDF]

  • Fiser, J., & Biederman, I. (2001). Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere. Vision Research, 41, 221-234. [PDF]

  • Young, M. E., Peissig, J. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2001). Discrimination of geons by pigeons: The effects of variations in surface depiction. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 97-106. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (2001). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: A review of recent research and theory. Spatial Vision, 13, 241-253. [PDF]


    • 2000

  • Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2000). The pigeon's discrimination of shape and location information. Visual Cognition, 7, 417-436. [PDF]

  • Subramaniam, S., Biederman, I., & Madigan, S. A. (2000). Accurate identification but no priming and chance recognition memory for pictures in RSVP sequences. Visual Cognition, 7, 511-535. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (2000). Differing views on views: Response to Hayward & Tarr (2000), Vision Research, 40, 3901-3905. [PDF]


    • Before 2000

  • Bar, M., & Biederman, I. (1999). Localizing the cortical region mediating visual awareness of object identitiy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 1790-1793. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Subramaniam, S., Bar, M., Kalocsai, P, & Fiser, J. (1999). Subordinate-Level object classification reexamined. Psychological Research, 62, 131-153. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1999). One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research, 39, 2885-2889. [PDF]

  • Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2000). The pigeon's discrimination of shape and location information. Visual Cognition, 7, 417-436. [PDF]

  • Bar, M., & Biederman, I. (1998). Subliminal visual priming. Psychological Science, 9, 464-469. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Phliosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London: Biological Sciences, 352, 1203-1219. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Gerhardstein, P.C. , Cooper, E. E., & Nelson, C. A. (1997). High level object recognition without an anterior Inferior Temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 35, 271-287. [PDF]

  • Fiser, J., Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1996). To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial fliters account for human shape recognition? Spatial Vision, 10, 237-271. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1995). Visual object recognition. In S. F. Kosslyn and D. N. Osherson (Eds.). An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd edition, Volume 2., Visual Cognition. MIT Press. Chapter 4, 121-165. [PDF]

  • Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1996). Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviror, 65, 465-475. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarrgnition: Reply to Tarr and Bulthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514. [PDF]

  • O'Kane, B., Biederman, I., Cooper, E. E., & Nystrom, B. (1995). An account of object identification confusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 21-41. [PDF]

  • Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., & Biederman, I. (1995). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth rotated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 205-221. [PDF]

  • Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J. & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for 3D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182. [PDF]

  • Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517. [PDF]

  • Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1992). Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 387-399. [PDF]

  • Cooper, E. E., Biederman, I., & Hummel, J. E. (1992). Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 191-214. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Cooper, E. E., Fox, P. W., & Mehadevan, R. S. (1992). Unexceptional spatial memory in an exceptional memorist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 654-657. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Hilton, H.J., & Hummel, J.E. (1991). Pattern goodness and pattern recognition. In J.R. Pomerantz & G.R. Lockhead (Eds.) The Perception of Structure, Chapter 5, 73-95. [PDF]

  • York, J. L., & Biederman, I. (1991). Hand movement speed and accuracy in detoxified alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 15, 982-990. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Object recognition and laterality: Null Results. Neuropsychologia, 29, 685-694. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Blickle, T. W., Teitelbaum, R. C., Klatsky, G. J., & Mezzanotte, R. J. (1988). Object identification in nonscene displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 456-467. [PDF]

  • York, J. L., & Biederman, I. (1988). Motor performance in detoxified alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 12, 119-124. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1988). Review of Visual Cognition by S. Pinker (Ed.). American Journal of Psychology, 101, 146-148. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface vs. Edge-Based Determinants of Visual Recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (l988). Aspects and extensions of a theory of human image understanding. In Z. Pylyshyn (Ed.) Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Pp. 370-428. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Shiffrar, M. (1987). Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 640-645. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1987). Matching Image Edges to Object Memory. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society, 384-392. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-Components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Teitelbaum, R. C., Mezzanotte, R. J. (1983). Scene perception: A faliure to find a benefit of expectancy or famliiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning And Memory, 9, 411-429. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, l4, l43-l77. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (l981). Do background depth gradients facliitate object identification? Perception, l0, 573-578. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., Rabinowitz, J. C., Francolini, C. M., & Plude, D. (l98l). Detecting the unexpected in photointerpretation. Human Factors, 23, l53-l64. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.) Perceptual Organization. Hlilsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Chap. 8, 213-263. [PDF]

  • Kreigman, D. H., &Biederman, I. (1980). How many letters in Bidwell's Ghost?: An investigation of the upper limits of full report from a brief visual stimulus. Perception &Psychophysics, 28, 82-84. [Featured in the Amateur Scientist section of Scientific American (January 1985).] [PDF]

  • Moore, T. E., & Biederman, I. (1979). The recognition of ungrammaticality: Multiple violations. Cognition, 7, 285-299. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Tsao, Y. C. (1979). On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications from Stroop-test results. Cognitive Psychology, 11, l25-l32. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1977). On processing information from a glance at a scene. Some implications for a syntax and semantics of visual processing. In S. Treu (Ed). User-Oriented Design of Interactive Graphics Systems. New York: ACM. [PDF]

  • Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (l976). Mental set and shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679. [PDF]

  • King, M., Meyer, G. E., Tangney, J., & Biederman, I. (1976). Shape constancy and a perceptual bias towards symmetry. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 129-l36. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J. C., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, W. (1974). On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 597-600. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., & Stacy, E. W. Jr. (1974). Stimulus probability Versus stimulus set size as determinants of memory scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 1100-1107. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, W. (1973). Searching for objects in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 22-27. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1973). Mental set and mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition, 1, 383-386. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. (1972). Human perfromance in contingent information-processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 219-238. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. & Kaplan, R. (1970). Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 434-439. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. & Zachary, R. A. (1970). Stimulus versus response probability effects in choice reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 189 - 192. [PDF]

  • Biederman, I. & Checkosky, S. F. (1970). Processing redundant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 486-490. [PDF]

  • Subramaniam, S., Biederman, I., & Cowie, R. I. D. Priming the naming of impossible familiiar objects.

  • Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. A direct test of the importance of viewpoint-invariant versus viewpoint-dependent features in object recognition.

  • Subramaniam, S., Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. Perceiving irregular objects.

  • Biederman, I., Dumas, J. S., & Lachman, R. (1968). The effects of stimulus uncertainty and S-R transitional probability on paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 864-868. [PDF]